51吃瓜

The US should not assume the mantle of leadership in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

A recent 聽by eight former US senior diplomatic and military officials urging the and to bolster ‘s defense by providing military assistance to the Ukrainians 鈥� including lethal defensive assistance 鈥� is misguided and dangerous. The report’s recommendations are not in the best interest of either the US or the transatlantic relationship. At best, this course of action will further damage any chances of a negotiated settlement between the West and ; at worst, it will provoke a full throated Russian military response against Ukraine to forestall the delivery of arms from the US. Then there will be calls to restore America鈥檚 credibility by force, and the United States will get drawn into yet another unwinnable conflict 鈥� this time against a nuclear-armed state.

The US has no vital national interests in this conflict. American security is not threatened by Russia鈥檚 actions in Ukraine. Nor are Russia’s actions in Ukraine in violation of United States treaty obligations. Russia has stayed clear of invading any country that is party to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 鈥� such action that would trigger the alliance鈥檚 collective self-defense clause and require a response by all 28 members of NATO, including the US.

The strongest reason given by the authors of this report to expand the Ukraine-Russia conflict is that: 鈥淩ussia鈥檚 actions in and against Ukraine pose the gravest threat to European security in more than 30 years.鈥� If this is true, and I do not believe it is, why are not the Europeans individually, or collectively through the (EU), putting together an arms package for Ukraine?

鈥淓veryone is waiting for American leadership. Nothing serious happens without the United States leading,鈥� says the group that wants the US to take the lead in going eye-ball to eye-ball with Russia. This is a self-serving terminological inexactitude, as Winston Churchill might have phrased it. and did not wait around for the US before they went to war with . France sent its Foreign Legion forces into Mali when it felt its national interests were at stake. And let us not forget Margaret Thatcher鈥檚 dispatch of the Royal Navy to reclaim the Falkland Islands by force from . As Gen. Brent Scowcroft, famed for his understanding of transatlantic issues and geopolitics, once told me: 鈥淲here the Europeans find their interests involved, they are probably more warlike than most other societies.鈥�

漏 Shutterstock

EU countries spend around $300 billion on their armed forces, which include two nuclear powers: France and Britain. Collectively, EU countries are richer than the United States. And most importantly, the Ukraine is in their backyard. If EU countries do not believe that the Ukraine-Russia conflict is a mortal threat to European security, why should the US make this dangerous assumption?

The reality is the Europeans know that Ukraine and Georgia are buffer states for Russia. The two countries separate Russia from the borders of the European Union and NATO. Russia will fight to keep it that way. As it did in 2008 when sounded uppity and made overtures to begin membership proceedings in NATO. Russia invaded and almost destroyed the country, just as it will in Ukraine to prevent it from joining the West. This is why calling Russia鈥檚 bluff 聽or sending lethal arms to Ukraine would be an expensive and dangerous mistake, which would also weaken the transatlantic alliance, America鈥檚 most important relationship.

The argument that every country should be able to determine what is in its national interests is an ideal not often fulfilled in the real world of power-politics. When a major power鈥檚 vital national interests are at stake, it forgets about academic niceties and does what it must. As America did when a small island off Florida thought it could run its own show and invited the Soviet Union to install a few nuclear tipped missiles on Cuba鈥檚 sovereign territory 鈥� we all know how that story ended.

The US should not assume the mantle of leadership in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The European Union should lead the charge to determine how to deal with this explosive situation. America should be on the team, but leave the leadership to the Europeans.

*[This article was originally published by .]

We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible. Join over 400 people to become a donor or you could choose to be a sponsor.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect 51吃瓜’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: / 听/听