One man, erratic and often unhinged, blew up the USIran accord that was the landmark foreign policy achievement of US President Barack Obamas second term. He then ordered the assassination of a top Iranian general visiting Iraq, dramatically raising tensions in the region. The other man is a traditional advocate of American exceptionalism, a supporter of the USIran agreement who promised to restore it upon taking office, only to ham-handedly bungle the job, while placating Israel.
In November, of course, American voters get to choose which of the two theyd trust with handling ongoing explosive tensions with Tehran across a Middle East now in crisis. The war in Gaza has already intensified the danger of an Iran-Israel conflict with the recent devastating Israeli on an Iranian consulate in Syria and the Iranian of drones and missiles dispatched against Israel only upping the odds. In addition, Irans axis of resistance including Hamas, Lebanons Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria has been challenging American hegemony throughout the Middle East, while drawing lethal US counterstrikes in Iraq, Syria and Yemen.
It was President Donald Trump, of course, who condemned the USIran agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive of Action (JCPOA) while running in 2016. With his team of fervent anti-Iran hawks, including Secretary of State and National Security Advisor , he took a wrecking ball to relations with Iran. Six years ago, Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA and, in what he called a campaign of maximum pressure, reinstituted, then redoubled political and economic sanctions against Tehran. Characteristically, he maintained a consistently belligerent policy toward the Islamic Republic, its very existence and warning that he could Iran.
Joe Biden had been a supporter of the accord, negotiated while he was Obamas vice president. During his 2020 presidential campaign, he promised to rejoin it. In the end, though, he kept Trumps onerous sanctions in place and months of negotiations went nowhere. While he put out to Tehran, crises erupting in 2022 and 2023, including the invasion of Israel by Hamas, placed huge obstacles in the way of tangible progress toward rebooting the JCPOA.
Worse yet, still reeling from the collapse of the 2015 agreement and ruled by a hardline government deeply suspicious of Washington, Iran is in no mood to trust another American diplomatic venture. In fact, during the earlier talks, it distinctly its hand, demanding far more than Biden could conceivably offer.
Meanwhile, Iran has accelerated its nuclear research and its potential production facilities, amassing large stockpiles of uranium that, as The Washington Post , could be converted to weapons-grade fuel for at least three bombs in a time frame ranging from a few days to a few weeks.
Trumps anti-Iran jihad
While the US and Iran werent exactly at peace when Trump took office in January 2017, the JCPOA had at least created the foundation for what many hoped would be a new era in their relations.
Iran had to drastically limit the scale and scope of its uranium enrichment program, reduce the number of centrifuges it could operate, curtail its production of low-enriched uranium suitable for fueling a power plant and ship nearly all of its enriched uranium stockpile out of the country. It closed and disabled its Arak plutonium reactor while agreeing to a stringent regime in which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would monitor every aspect of its nuclear program.
In exchange, the US, the EU and the UN agreed to remove an array of economic sanctions, which, until then, had arguably made Iran the sanctioned country in the world.
Free of some of them, its economy began to recover, while its oil exports, its economic lifeblood, nearly . According to How Sanctions Work, a new from Stanford University Press, Iran absorbed a windfall of $11 billion in foreign investment, gained access to $55 billion in assets frozen in Western banks and saw its inflation rate fall from 45% to 8%.
But Trump acted forcefully to undermine it all. In October 2017, he Irans compliance with the accord, amid false charges that it had violated the agreement. (Both the EU and the IAEA agreed that it .)
Many observers feared that Trump was creating an environment in which Washington could launch an Iraq-style war of aggression. In a New York Times , Larry Wilkerson, chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell at the time of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, suggested that Trump was repeating the pattern of unproven allegations that President George W. Bush had relied on: The Trump administration is using much the same playbook to create a false impression that war is the only way to address the threats posed by Iran.
Finally, on May 8, 2018, Trump the JCPOA, and sanctions on Iran were back in place. Relentlessly, he and Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin piled on ever more of them in what they called a campaign of . The administration reactivated old sanctions were reactivated and added hundreds of new ones targeting Irans banking and oil industries, its shipping industry, its metal and petrochemical firms and, finally, its construction, mining, manufacturing and textile sectors. The administration also targeted countless individual officials and businessmen, along with dozens of companies worldwide that dealt, however tangentially, with Irans sanctioned firms.
It was, Mnuchin Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a maximum pressure campaign for sanctions We will continue to ramp up, more, more, more. At one point, in a gesture both meaningless and insulting, the Trump administration even sanctioned Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Irans supreme leader, a move moderate President Hassan Rouhani outrageous and idiotic, adding that Trump was afflicted by mental retardation.
Then, in 2019, Trump took the unprecedented of labeling the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Irans chief military arm, a foreign terrorist organization. He put a violent exclamation point on that when he ordered the of Irans premier military leader, General , during his visit to Baghdad.
Administration officials made it clear that the goal was the regime and that they hoped the sanctions would provoke an uprising to overthrow the government. Iranians did, in fact, rise up in , including most recently 2023s movement, partly thanks to tougher economic times due to the sanctions. The governments response, however, was a brutal crackdown. Meanwhile, on the nuclear front, having painstakingly complied with the JCPOA until 2018, instead of being even more conciliatory, Iran its program, enriching far more uranium than was necessary to fuel a power plant. And militarily, it initiated a series of with US naval forces in the Persian Gulf, or foreign-operated oil tankers, a US drone in the Straits of Hormuz and launched drones meant to Saudi Arabias huge oil industry.
The American withdrawal from the JCPOA and the severity of the sanctions that followed were seen by Iran as an attempt to break the back of the Islamic Republic or, worse, to completely destroy it, , a veteran analyst at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and one of the authors of How Sanctions Work, told me. So, they circled the wagons. Iran became far more securitized, and it handed more and more power to the IRGC and the security forces.
Bidens reign of (unforced) error
Having long supported a deal with Iran in , as of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and, in , in a speech to Jewish leaders Joe Biden Trumps decision to quit the JCPOA a self-inflicted disaster. But on entering the Oval Office, Biden failed to simply rejoin it.
Instead, he let months go by, while in a quest to somehow improve it. Even though the JCPOA had been working quite well, the Biden team insisted it a longer and stronger agreement and that Iran first had to return to compliance with the agreement, even though it was the US that had pulled out of the deal.
Consider that an unforced error. Early in 2021 there was one last chance to restore the agreement, , an expert on Iran and executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told me. He could have just come back to the JCPOA by issuing an executive order, but he didnt do anything for what turned out to be the ten most critical weeks.
It was critical because the Iranian administration of President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, responsible for negotiating the original accord, was expiring and new elections were scheduled for June 2021. One of the major mistakes Biden made is that he delayed the nuclear talks into April, Seyed Hossein Mousavian, Princeton University scholar and a former top Iranian official who was part of its nuclear negotiating team from 2005 to 2007. This was a golden opportunity to negotiate with the Rouhani team, but he delayed until a month before the Iranian elections. He could have finished the deal by May.
When the talks finally did resume in April gingerly, to The New York Times they were further complicated because, just days earlier, a covert Israeli operation had devastated one of Irans top nuclear research facilities with an enormous . Iran responded by pledging to take the purity of its enriched uranium from , which didnt exactly help the talks, nor did Bidens unwillingness to condemn Israel for a provocation clearly designed to wreck them.
That June, Iranians a new president, Ebrahim Raisi, a hardline cleric and militant supporter of the axis of resistance. He took office in August, spent months assembling his administration and appointed a new team to lead the nuclear talks. By July, according to American officials, those talks on a new version of the JCPOA had near complete agreement, only to fall apart when the Iranian side backed out.
It was also clear that the Biden administration didnt prioritize the Iran talks, being less than eager to deal with bitter opposition from Israel and its allies on Capitol Hill. Bidens view was that hed go along with reviving the JCPOA only if he felt it was absolutely necessary and to do it at the least political cost, Parsi points out. And it looked like hed only do it if it were acceptable to Israel.
Over the next two years, the US and Iran engaged in an unproductive series of negotiations that seemed to come tantalizingly close to an agreement only to stop short. By the summer of 2022, the nuclear talks once again appeared to be making progress, only to fail yet again. After 15 months of intense, constructive negotiations in Vienna and countless interactions with the JCPOA participants and the US, I have concluded that the space for additional significant compromises has been exhausted, Josep Borrell Fontelles, the foreign policy chief for the EU.
By the end of 2022, Biden declared the Iran deal dead and his chief negotiator insisted he wouldnt waste time trying to revive it. As Mousavian told me, Irans crackdown on the Woman, Life, Freedom revolt in the wake of its morality police torturing and killing a young woman, , arrested on the streets of Tehran without a veil and increased concern about Iranian being delivered to Russia for its war in Ukraine soured Biden on even talking to Iran.
Nonetheless, in 2023, yet another round of talks helped, perhaps, by a between the US and Iran, including an agreement to $6 billion in Iranian oil revenues resulted in a tentative, informal accord that Iranian officials as a political ceasefire. to The Times of Israel, the understandings would see Tehran pledge not to enrich uranium beyond its current level of 60 percent purity, to better cooperate with U.N. nuclear inspectors, to stop its proxy terror groups from attacking U.S. contractors in Iraq and Syria, to avoid providing Russia with ballistic missiles and to release three American-Iranians held in the Islamic Republic.
But even that informal agreement was consigned to the dustbin of history after Hamass October 7 doomed any rapprochement between the US and Iran.
The question remains: Could some version of the JCPOA be salvaged in 2025?
Certainly not if, as now seems increasingly possible, a shooting war breaks out involving the US, Iran and Israel, a catastrophic crisis with unforeseeable consequences. And certainly not if Trump is reelected, which would plunge the US and Iran deeper into their cold (if not a devastatingly hot) war.
What do the experts say? Against the possibility of a revived accord, according to Vali Nasr, Iran has concluded that Washington is an utterly untrustworthy negotiating partner whose word is worthless. Iran has decided that there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans and they decided to escalate tensions further in order to gain what they hope is additional leverage 措勳莽--措勳莽 兜硃莽堯勳紳眶喧棗紳.
Bidens intention was to revive the deal, says Hossein Mousavian. He did take some practical steps to do so and at least he tried to deescalate the situation. Iran was, however, less willing to move forward because Biden insisted on maintaining the sanctions Trump had imposed.
The Quincy Institutes Trita Parsi, however, catches the full pessimism of a moment in which Iran and Israel (backed remarkably fully by Washington) are at the edge of actual war. Given the rising tensions in the region, not to speak of actual clashes, he says gloomily, The best that we can hope for is that nothing happens. There is no hope for anything more.
And thats where hope is today in a Middle East that seems to be heading for hell in a handbasket.
[ first published this piece.]
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect 51勛圖s editorial policy.
Support 51勛圖
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51勛圖 has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOs journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.










Comment