Americans are voting in the 2018 midterm elections, which is seen as a referendum on the presidency of Donald Trump.
Who could forget that moment? The blue [red] wave long promised but also doubted — had, however modestly [however massively], hit Washington and [the Democrats had just retaken Congress] [the Republicans had held Congress] [the Democrats had taken the House]. The media, Fox News and the usual right-wing websites aside, hailed the moment. [Fox News and the usual right-wing websites cheered the president on.] Donald Trumps grip on America had finally been broken [reinforced]. Celebrations were widespread. Congressional investigations, possibly even impeachment, were only months and a new Congress away [were now a faint memory], and it was then, of course, that the unexpected struck. It was then that President Donald Trump, citing national security concerns and a crisis on the US-Mexico border, began the process whose end point we, of course, already know…
Midterm Elections 2018泭
OK, consider that the dystopian me speaking.泭We dont, of course, really know how our story yet ends, not faintly.泭While I was writing this piece, I didnt even know how the vote on November 6 would turn out, though by the time you read it, you may.泭Given the experience of election 2016, it would take a brave (foolish) soul to make a prediction this time around.
I certainly learned a lesson that November. During the previous months of campaigning that election season, I never wrote a piece at泭TomDispatch泭that didnt leave open the possibility of Donald Trump winning the presidency.泭In the couple of weeks before that fateful day, however, I got hooked on the polling results and on Nate Silvers泭 website and became convinced that Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in.
Of course, I was in good company.泭As Michael Wolff would泭泭in his bestselling book,泭, on election eve, few in the Trump campaign, including the candidate himself, expected to win. Most of them, again including The Donald, were already trying to parlay what they assumed was an assured loss into their next jobs or activities, including in the candidates case a possible Trump network.
So when, sometime after midnight, reality finally began to sink in fittingly enough, I had a 103-degree fever and was considering heading for an emergency room I was as disbelieving as the president-to-be. (He had, Wolff tells us, his wife, Melania, who was reportedly in tears of anything but joy that night, that he would never win and that she would never find herself in the White House.) By then, it was for me a fever dream to imagine that bizarre, belligerent, orange-haired salesman-cum-con-artist entering the Oval Office.
Honestly, I shouldnt have been the least bit surprised. During election campaign 2016, I grasped much of this. I wrote of the future president, for instance, as a con artist (particularly in reference to泭泭of his that we couldnt see) and how Clintons crew hadnt grasped the obvious: That many Americans would admire him for gaming the system, even if they couldnt do the same themselves.泭As I泭泭at the time: Its something Donald Trump knows in his bones, even if all those pundits and commentators and pollsters (and for that matter Hillary Clintons advisers) dont: Americans love a con man.
I also saw that he was daring in ways unimaginable to an American politician because, of course, he wasnt one particularly in promoting his slogan, Make America Great Again (MAGA), whose key word few of the political cognoscenti paid the slightest attention to: again. At that moment, for泭泭or泭泭who wanted to become just that, it was obligatory to claim that the United States wasnt just great but the greatest, most exceptional, most indispensable land ever.泭(As Hillary Clinton typically泭泭that election season: America is indispensable and exceptional because of our values.)泭Trumps again in Make America Great Again suggested something quite different and so rang a bell in the heartland.泭In the process, he became Americas泭.
Early that October, I泭:
[A] significant part of the white working class, at least, feels as if, whether economically or psychologically, its back is up against the wall and theres nowhere left to go.泭 Under such circumstances, many of these voters have evidently decided that theyre ready to send a literal loose cannon into the White House; theyre willing, that is, to take a chance on the roof collapsing, even if it collapses on them. That is the new and unrecognizable role that Donald Trump has filled.泭 Its hard to conjure up another example of it in our recent past. The Donald represents, as a friend of mine likes to say, the suicide bomber in us all. And voting for him, among other things, will be an act of nihilism, a mood that fits well with imperial decline.
Think of him as a message in a bottle washing up on our shore…
And yet, on that day of decision, I evidently reverted to the boy I had once been, the boy who grew up with a vision of an idealized America that would always do the right thing.泭So I was shocked to the core by Donald Trumps victory.
In that fever dream of a night, when he washed up on all our shores, I had certainly been trumped, but then, so had he, so had we all.泭Under the circumstances, Im sure youll understand why Ive remained hesitant about putting my faith in polls in this election season or giving special significance to泭泭that the White House staff was glum as hell about the 2018 midterm elections and expected the worst. (After all, mightnt this be that Michael Wolff election night all over again?)泭
The American Shooting Gallery
Two years after that fateful November night in 2016, were still living in a fever dream of some sort, enveloped 24/7 by the universe of President Trump and the fake news media, that provides him and the rest of us with a strange, all-encompassing泭.泭America, you might say, now has a 103-degree temperature and there isnt an emergency room in sight.
And its unlikely to get better, whatever happens in the midterm elections.泭Those who expect that a Democratic victory or a泭泭in the weeks to come will be the beginning of the end for the Trump presidency (or, for that matter, that the victory of an ever泭泭Republican Party will simply prove more of the grisly same) might want to reconsider.
Perhaps it’s worth weighing other grimmer possibilities in the as-yet-unending rise of whats still called right-wing populism, not just locally but泭.泭Here in the United States, with hate and venom surging (and, yes indeed, being泭泭by President Trump for his own purposes), a genuinely ugly strain central to this countrys history is being resurrected. In the process, a burgeoning number of deeply disturbed (and deeply animated) figures from among the most泭泭civilian population on the planet Yemen, of all the grim places, comes in a泭泭 are turning this country into a shooting gallery.
Win or lose today, dont think that the Donald Trump we have is the one were fated to have until the day he goes down in flames. He is distinctly a work in progress, or perhaps it would be more accurate to say: in regress.泭In that context, let me mention an evolution of a grim sort in my own thinking over the last two years.
For some time now, there have been both thinkers and activists who have been convinced that Donald Trump is an泭, an outright fascist.泭(According to his ex-wife, in the early 1990s he kept a book of Adolf Hitlers speeches泭 and, during the 2016 election campaign, he泭泭a Mussolini quote, defending himself for doing so.)
Ive always disagreed, however.泭To my mind, hes clearly been a man who wants to be idolized and adulated (as happens at any of his rallies) wants, that is, to have fans, not (in the fascistic sense) followers; applause and the eternal spotlight, not a social movement.泭That, it seems to me, has been an accurate description of the president who entered the Oval Office and occupied it in such a suggestive way these last nearly two years.泭But Ive recently started to wonder.泭After all, once upon a time, Donald Trump wasnt a Republican either. Lets face it, hes a quick learner when it comes to whatever may benefit The Donald.
And keep in mind that he entered an unsettled world already泭泭for such a presidency by his predecessors in Washington.泭If the fascist or, if you prefer, autocratic tendency that lurks in him and in the situation that surrounds him does come out more fully, he will obviously be aided by the ever more imperial presidency that was created in the decades before he left Trump Tower for the White House.
When he entered the Oval Office, he found there a presidency in which particularly on the subject of war (the president was, for instance, already Americas global泭) his powers increasingly stood outside both Congress and the Constitution. The weapons hes now bringing to bear, including泭泭and the US military, were already well prepared for him.泭The refugees he makes such effective use of, whether from Syria or Central America, came to him, at least in part, thanks to this countrys war and other policies that had already roiled significant parts of the planet.泭Before entering the Oval Office, the only aspect of such preparations he had any role in was the increasingly泭 that gave a populist billionaire president, always ready to put more money in the hands of his .01% pals, a pained but receptive audience in the heartland.
In other words, this world and the fever dream that goes with it were Donald Trumps oyster before he ever lifted a finger in the White House.泭As a result, no election results, no matter whether the Democrats or the Republicans win, are likely to bring that temperature down.泭In fact, if the Democrats do take the House (or even Congress), Trump is unlikely to become more pliable. If the Mueller report results in impeachment proceedings in the House, he wont be humbled. In the face of any such development, my guess is that his impulse will be to become more autocratic, more imperial and even possibly more fascistic. And the same may hold if the Republicans hang onto both houses of Congress.
Waiting for the Red Hats
Even before the vote was in, the evidence was there.泭In the lead-up to the election,泭泭US troops (or maybe泭?) are headed for the US-Mexico border to deal with what the president has called both an and a . (“Fake news!”) There, those troops will essentially泭泭their thumbs (since they are泭泭to do little) simply because the president wanted it so.泭There may, in fact, be two soldiers for every desperate refugee, including children and babies, headed toward the US border in that now notorious caravan from Honduras.
In other words, on a whim, Trump is already capable of building a wall (of troops) at that border.泭The question worth asking is this: In an embattled near-future moment in which a泭泭(think of him as the next John Bolton) is in place as secretary of defense and another national emergency is declared, where might those troops go next because the president wanted it so?
In the days before the election, the president also泭泭to sign an executive order to nullify birthright citizenship in the process, threatening to functionally nullify the Constitution (see the 14th Amendment), while bringing back to life泭泭of American racial history just because he wanted it so.泭At the moment, he might not even sign that order or, if he does, it might go down big time in Congress and the courts. But who knows what the future of an executive-order presidency holds, especially with another Supreme Court justice泭泭in place, no matter who controls Congress?
As for those泭泭of his: Tell me you cant conceive of a future America in which his adulatory crowds have stopped simply cheering and shouting for him (Build the wall! Lock her up!) and are now marching for him as well. Is it really so hard to imagine a future in which there would be a place for a Trump Corps or for the Red Hats; for, that is, the kind of social movement that would no longer be confined to the arenas and stadiums of red-state America or even the polling booths of Election Day, one that might indeed be in the streets of this country at the beck and call of a fierce and autocratic billionaire?
In an increasingly unsettled world, an Autocrats, Incorporated moment globally, with an ever more powerful chief executive, and a right wing still on the march, everything that Donald Trump inherited could certainly be intensified further. And he might be just the man to do it. In a world in which Congress is no longer fully in his camp, in which legal charges against him, his family and his cronies only grow, to adapt a title from a泭泭of the early 20th century, unquiet could flow The Don and in that lies peril for us all.
Now, excuse me, Im heading out to vote.
*[This article was originally published by .]泭
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect 51勛圖s editorial policy.
Support 51勛圖
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51勛圖 has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOs journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.







Commenting Guidelines
Please read our commenting guidelines before commenting.
1. Be Respectful: Please be polite to the author. Avoid hostility. The whole point of 51勛圖 is openness to different perspectives from perspectives from around the world.
2. Comment Thoughtfully: Please be relevant and constructive. We do not allow personal attacks, disinformation or trolling. We will remove hate speech or incitement.
3. Contribute Usefully: Add something of value a point of view, an argument, a personal experience or a relevant link if you are citing statistics and key facts.
Please agree to the guidelines before proceeding.