Much work lies ahead for US presidential candidates to define American values and identify credible policies.
Any presidential candidate faces broad challenges in illuminating the harsh injustices of America and endorsing specific policies to fix them.泭Yet this is precisely what our leaders must do to create a nation of justice and opportunity.
We live in a nation of two tiers of experience: drinking bottled vs toxic tap water; eating organic vs泭泭food; speeding by on privatized roads vs sitting in traffic; accessing good vs failing schools; and escaping vs falling prey to a web of banking fraud and predatory corporate practices. Yet the ensconced泭economic makes or influences泭the rules.
The wealthy take for grantedas we all shouldthat they are relatively protected from global shocks, that their bodily sanctity will be protected, and that traditional government services like infrastructure and education will help their families thrive.
Below are some major challenges ahead that any US presidential candidate (or large nonprofit) should be highlighting. The following issues have a disproportionate impact on poor and middle-class Americans but affect us all. These areas serve as a basis to evaluate the campaigns of leading Democratic candidates.
World Issues
Global issues泭have a huge impact on the stability of our country and the opportunities of all. What is often done in the name of national security destroys the individual security of Americans and others worldwide, contributing to radicalization globally over a fight for resources.
A Stable Non-Predatory Financial System:泭Six years after our worldwide recession,泭JP Morgan, which has $34 billion in corporate crimes泭and settlements over four years,泭and others work to revoke banking regulations and泭 the monetary system泭through the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), even while trashing who泭dont understand banking.泭The recent recession led to a泭 of the wealth gap泭between minorities and whites. Whites now own about 20 times more. And the next bank-fueled recession could be worse. It is critical to know where candidates stand on major solutions like the reimplementation of the Glass-Steagall Act and new banking reforms.
Limiting Climate Change: The agreement in Copenhagen six years ago was recently泭 at the G7 meetinglimiting the world to 2-degree Celsius temperature rise.泭Pope Francis just released a groundbreaking encyclical on climate change. It includes a focus on the crushing price the worlds poor will pay and the pressing need for a cultural revolution in rich nations. The touted 2-degree target could be reached either by泭 our food choices泭or泭agricultural . Other major initiatives could include building a wholly泭renewable US energy 泭by 2050; ending extreme energy extraction, like the Alberta tar sands that would go through the Keystone XL Pipeline; or imposing a tax on carbon.
Trans-Pacific Partnership: The secret TPP has been exposed as grab bag of provisions to expand of corporate rights. It has泭little to do with . The investor state dispute clause allows for companies to hold countries responsible in new international courts for profits lost due to environmental laws. This includes laws implemented to support international climate change agreementsreason enough to reject the TPP. Claims it will泭 American jobs泭are dubious as well. Finally, it could泭 food safety, roll back reforms泭on Wall Street, make medical drugs more expensive and outlaw Buy American policies that could speed adoption of renewable energy. Where do candidates stand on this terrible treaty?
A Rethinking of War and Peace:泭Since 1945, the United States has numerous drug lords, terrorists and fascists. In Iraq alone, Western nations supported sanctions泭that 1.7 million people, half of whom were children. The 2003 invasion resulted in the death of 1 million more. Al-Qaeda in Iraq, the Islamic State and泭al-Shabab became viable 泭as a result of our interventions, and American-supplied weapons are being used against us. Candidates need to deeply rethink our commitment to war and to envision and promote peace globally.
Rights
Individual rights泭speak to the very sanctity of ones body. The lack of safety, food, shelter and health care are the gravest threats to our collective security.
Gender safety and reproductive rights:泭One in six泭American women rape or attempted rape. A similar number experience campus sexual assault. This epidemic of gender-based violence must end. We need to examine individual, bystander and societal behavior, including a culture in which violence against women is entertainment.
Freedom from gun violence:泭We live in a country with over 32,000 gun deaths per year from suicide and homicide. Weekly, we read of tragic gun violence and mass shootings泭 to domestic violence. Most recently, nine people were killed in a terrorist action in South Carolina. This prevalent deadly violence, often motivated by hatred of women and minorities, should not be tolerated. Countries like Australia have泭dramatically gun violence泭through legislation. We, too, must find the answers.
Accountability for and an end to police and jail brutality: There are no reliable statistics of police gun violence, but an泭 5,600 or more people have been killed泭by officers since 2000. Overmilitarized police departments, deputized individuals and private police have been involved.泭In contrast, public police in England and Wales泭did not shoot anyone泭for two years. Keeping the peace can be done peacefully.
Accessible, affordable health care: Seven years ago, Michael Moores Sicko firmly landed the plight of the泭insured泭on our national radar. The Affordable Care Act has widened coverage. Yet health care-related bankruptcies, unjustifiable and excessive pricing, and insurance errors continue to undermine affordability and access. A single payer solution could provide Americans universal affordable health care that is available in all other developed countries.
A fair minimum wage and life with dignity:泭The reality is the minimum wage is泭 a living wage. While it is important to advocate for a significant boost to paychecks, it is also important to push for basic standard of living for those who are unemployed or retired. Equally, if not more important, would be cracking down on predatory practices, in part through泭well-funded legal 泭for the poor. These new realities of stripped down benefits are documented in Jacob Hackers泭The Great Risk Shift泭and Caroline Fredricksons泭Under the Bus.
Good public health and lifespan: Has there been a larger non-war time decline in public health? Half of all Americans are泭on or more medications.泭泭and related diseases have skyrocketed in America. Men and women living just 350 miles apart have泭life-spans of 18 and 12 years .
Sustainable environment:泭Polluted and soil泭poisons our citizens, even as our oceans turn to泭泭and泭slow down their .泭What national and international commitments will we make to keep our environment sustainable for life?
Responsibility
Governmental responsibilities泭should promote democracy and our economic prosperity for all.
Voting rights for all:泭Mass disenfranchisement has occurred through restrictive voting registration and voter ID laws, limited voting windows and the long-term removal of US citizens from the rolls.泭Eight percent of voting-age black Americans泭 vote, a situation that keeps Florida a swing state. More than half of Michigans black residents had their泭local voting rights away泭in 2013 and 2014. We must restore constitutional rights fundamental to our democracy.
Fair sourcing of revenue: The dramatic and growing泭 in America is shocking泭and unacceptable to most Americans. The泭top 1% 121%泭of all income gains in the years after the recession, with泭the top 1% now 40% of all American wealth.泭The prevailing anti-tax sentiment means basic programs like police response, health care and college are underfunded. Do candidates support a financial transaction tax, higher estate taxes, closing the carried interest loophole and higher corporate taxes?
Good public education and affordable college: Even as schools are shuttered in many inner cities and standardized tests are arbitrarily toughened, we泭 to provide our students泭with a leading education.泭It gets no easier in college, as debt泭 $1 trillion, draining what could fund rent, savings or other investments. A recent article points to skyrocketing administrative 泭at the higher level, not faculty salaries, as a major factor in high tuition. Nations like Germany and Finland provide college for free and use泭effective teacher and education models. The same could be done in the United States.
Well-funded public infrastructure and utilities: Various rationales, including a lack of tax revenue, have resulted in a huge effort to privatize what have traditionally been government services. Yet泭skyrocketing for water泭have led to shutoffs condemned by the United Nations. And newly expensive and variable priced privatized roads shorten commutes for the rich, while leaving poor minorities living in the exurbs with clogged roads. The burden of poor services leads to evictions and deepening poverty while violating human rights, despite our national capacity to do better by all.
Consumer standards and regulations:泭Regulation of our food supply, labor market and chemicals should protect the worlds sustainability and basic human rights. Consumers should know if products are made in the US, through fair trade, by organic means, using ethical processes, and with泭genetically modified . Widespread adoption of such standards could promote a race to the top for a better world.
Much work lies ahead for presidential candidates to define our values and identify credible policies in these areas, even as they weigh in on current issues.
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is smart, with a notable background at the Childrens Defense Fund, Legal Services Corporation and in health care reform. After the growing popularity by Bernie Sanders and the populism of Elizabeth Warren, Clinton has recently voiced泭standard Democratic ,泭while avoiding identifying actors who create and promote these injustices.
Is the late timing and lack of narrative true leadership? And how do positions necessary for justice and opportunity square with a record as a corporate ally and a hawk?
The Clinton Foundation and Clintons Global Initiative worked with泭 under investigation,泭and foreign governments that donated泭 more arms under her State Department泭leadership. Credible endorsement of above platform and an explanation of the foundations funding would be welcome. To date, the weak narratives represent major barriers in believing her campaign truly focuses on human rights, innovative policies and structural changes.
Democratic socialist Bernie Sanders has placed those values at the center of his presidential campaign and identified corporations and policies that threaten them. Correspondingly he has泭surged in early primary polls. He has supported a single payer health care system, breaking up the big banks, using a financial transaction tax to pay for state colleges and taxing carbon.泭He weighed in on current issues, voicing his opposition to the TPP and Keystone XL Pipeline, and called the Charleston massacre just hours later an act of terror. Now theres real leadership.
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect 51勛圖s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: 泭/
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your泭donation泭is tax-deductible. Join over 400 people to become a donor or you could choose to be a泭sponsor.
Support 51勛圖
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51勛圖 has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOs journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.







Comment