51吃瓜

Recent trends show that while rents are falling for high-end dwellings, middle- and low-income renters are still struggling to afford housing.

A lasting fallout from the Great Recession has been a听听in the number of Americans who are renting rather than owning their homes. Sky-high real estate costs, financial insecurity and job instability have pushed many people out of the home-buying market and into rental units, especially in large cities. Following supply and demand, the increase in renters has come with an increase in rental prices. Those prices have eased a bit in the last several months, but there is a听: Rents for the most expensive places are declining, while rents for cheaper places are rising, adversely affecting those on the lower end of the income scale.

The Knowledge@Wharton radio show, which airs on听, invited three experts to explain what鈥檚 happening in the rental market.听听is a real estate professor at Wharton and a fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research; Aaron Terrazas is a senior economist at Zillow; and Jenny Schuetz is a fellow in the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution. The following are key points from their conversation.

It All Goes Back to Supply and Demand

At first glance, it doesn鈥檛 seem logical that rental prices would decrease only for higher-end units and not across the board. But the experts said a deeper dive into the data reveals the complexities of supply and demand in the market.

In the last several years, most metropolitan areas have seen a flurry of apartment construction to house new residents who are flocking to cities in search of jobs. Most of that construction has been in luxury units with sky-high rents rather than more affordable accommodations. The resulting glut of upscale units is what is easing price pressure on that side of the market.

鈥淲hat this latest data is telling us is there are a lot of different submarkets within a given metro area, and when you look at where the building has been going on, it鈥檚 really been geared at the very top,鈥� Keys said. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e not seeing that same construction at the lower end, so you鈥檙e getting this discrepancy between the top and the bottom.鈥�

Meanwhile, Keys noted, there are a lot of lower-income renters who are desperate for housing they cannot find, so the competition is fierce. 鈥淪ome of it is just a simple supply-and-demand story.鈥�

Terrazas agreed and cautioned against taking a simplistic view of the market. Typically, analysts tend to look at medians and averages in real estate, but they should be examining the 鈥渢ails鈥� of the distribution to get the full picture of what is happening at the top and the bottom of the market.

While over-investment in upscale rentals has influenced prices, Terrazas said, the numbers also show that more well-to-do millennials are buying homes right now. 鈥淭hose higher-income young adults who typically rent those apartments have been out buying homes. The labor market is very tight. Interest rates are still very low. Those are the people who have been propelling the purchase market, leaving vacancies in the rental market. That鈥檚 not happening for lower-income renters.鈥�

Schuetz thinks the question of why rents haven鈥檛 started to soften farther down the price spectrum is an important one to ponder because the discrepancy indicates an imbalance in the market. The lack of middle- and low-income rental units is a problem that has been decades in the making.

鈥淲e鈥檝e certainly seen a boom in building in the last several years, but that comes after the absolute trough during the Great Recession. And we鈥檝e been under-building multifamily housing for about 25 years now,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e鈥檝e seen supply finally start to catch up at the high end. We would expect that鈥檚 eventually going to translate into at least more stable rents in the middle of the distribution, possibly lower, but it鈥檚 going to take a while for that to happen.鈥�

It鈥檚 Still Location, Location, Location

Like everything in real estate, location is the mitigating factor. Rental affordability depends largely on where you live. Schuetz听听that outlined two distinct affordability problems in America.

In high-cost cities, including New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC, the dearth of housing means prices are very high even for middle-income earners. Even relatively high-income earners can鈥檛 afford to buy homes in those cities, so they are staying in rentals longer. At the same time, bottom-income earners representing 20% to 25% of households don鈥檛 make enough money to pay for even modest-quality apartments.

鈥淲e鈥檝e got a lot of people who are competing for the bottom end of the market,鈥� Schuetz said. 鈥淭hey have no place else to go, and their incomes just aren鈥檛 keeping up with the cost of inflation and maintenance of apartment buildings.鈥�

Housing affordability for low-income families is a national problem regardless of location, she said. 鈥淩ents are going to be lower in, say, rural Texas or Detroit, but the incomes are also proportionately lower,鈥� Schuetz said. 鈥淧oor families can鈥檛 afford to pay the rent pretty much anywhere; middle-income families are only stretched in the high-cost markets.鈥�听

Can Policy Fix the Crisis?

The experts said policy changes at the federal, state and local levels can ease some of the burdens in the housing market. But the changes have to be tactical and specific if they are going to work.

If the dearth of modestly priced rentals is the problem, then building more of them is the solution. Yet many cities have too much red tape getting in the way, Keys said.

鈥淭here are a number of barriers to building, but a big constraint is local zoning policy that inhibits more dense building, especially around transit,鈥� he noted. 鈥淎 lot of cities are really struggling with the barriers that have been put in place through restrictive zoning.鈥�

At the federal level, existing programs to help lower-income Americans with housing are relatively inelastic, he said. Unlike food assistance or unemployment insurance, housing vouchers and other funds don鈥檛 expand and contract to meet fluctuations in demand. That鈥檚 unlikely to change under the Trump administration, Keys said, citing a听 that discussed the inaction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Some individual legislators are pushing policy changes forward, including US Senators Cory Booker and Kamala Harris. Both have introduced rent relief measures that would provide tax credits to renters, and Booker wants to use Community Development Block Grants to incentivize cities to relax zoning restrictions. But Schuetz said both measures are limited in scope, so they don鈥檛 address all aspects of housing affordability.

In California, Democratic state Senator Scott Wiener introduced a bill to allow the state to override local zoning laws that prohibit high-density construction around transit stations.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 a huge proposal that鈥檚 different than anything we鈥檝e ever seen before,鈥� Schuetz said. 鈥淯nfortunately, it went down in committee. But I imagine something like that will make a reappearance.鈥�

California is also contemplating expanding rent control to include newer buildings.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 an extremely controversial proposal,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e have quite a bit of evidence that rent control ends up reducing the housing stock and actually hurting poor families. But there are interesting coalitions building around that because there鈥檚 such a sense in high-cost cities that rent has been going up faster than income, and this is a measure to try to help.鈥�

Is the American Dream Dead?

America has long rewarded its citizens for becoming property owners rather than renters. Homeowners are allowed to deduct mortgage interest from their taxes, and they aren鈥檛 taxed on profits from the sale of a primary residence.

That tradition skews the debt vs. equity trade-off toward debt, Keys said. High-income earners, who are more likely to be homeowners anyway, reap the greatest reward from mortgage-interest deductions. It鈥檚 a benefit that doesn鈥檛 necessarily help those on the margins, he said.

鈥淭o the extent that we want to encourage the American dream and get people into a home, and the stability that home can potentially provide as a way to benefit a neighborhood, as a way to build wealth, we don鈥檛 think the mortgage-interest deduction is really designed to do any of those things,鈥� he said.

Terrazas cited a听听that asked Americans in the 20 largest metro areas to characterize their ideal home. Overwhelmingly, across all age groups, a single-family home in the suburbs was the winner. That result challenges the popular narrative about downsizing and city living, he said.

鈥淲e鈥檝e heard so much about the shifting preferences of Americans and the decision between renting or owning. In some respects, it鈥檚 certainly evolving. In some respects, it鈥檚 still very much the same,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hat American dream is still very strong but evolving around the edges.鈥�

Terrazas said the听听enacted this year contains changes that 鈥渂egin to lift Uncle Sam鈥檚 finger a little bit away from 鈥� pushing Americans toward homeownership.鈥� Those changes include caps on mortgage deduction and loopholes that allow homeowners to deduct a larger portion of their state and local taxes if they rent out a portion of their house.

The Renting vs. Owning Cycle Will Keep Turning

Terrazas said he believes Americans will continue to want to buy homes. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think there鈥檚 any doubt that buying is going to continue to hold a strong appeal in the American imagination,鈥� he said. 鈥淭here鈥檚 something fundamentally attractive about fixing your housing costs for 30 years as opposed to being subject to 12-month contracts.鈥�

Shifts in the economy and personal finances will influence whether Americans buy homes in their 20s, 30s or 40s, and what kind of property they purchase. But Terrazas thinks a 鈥渟trong majority鈥� of citizens will be homeowners. However, he acknowledged a steady demand for rentals even as that market slows down.

Schuetz said the strength of the rental market since the recession indicates that renting is the right choice for many people. She said federal policies need to be adjusted to accommodate the fact that renting is 鈥済oing to part of almost everybody鈥檚 life cycle鈥� as people face greater uncertainty over careers, marriage, children and other variables.

鈥淲e鈥檇 like people to pick the tenure that鈥檚 appropriate for their financial situation, their place in the life cycle, their job situation,鈥� she said. 鈥淩enters have an easier time breaking the lease and moving to a new city if they get a job offer, and people who haven鈥檛 yet made permanent family arrangements may need to change the size of the house they鈥檙e living in.鈥�

There鈥檚 big advantage to having flexibility, Schuetz noted. 鈥淲e鈥檇 like households to be able to make those decisions based on their personal financial circumstances, not based on federal tax policy that gives them an incentive to buy when maybe that鈥檚 not the best decision for them.鈥�

*[This article was originally published by , a partner institution of 51吃瓜.]

The views expressed in this article are the author鈥檚 own and do not necessarily reflect 51吃瓜鈥檚 editorial policy.