Poverty, inflation, food scarcity, medicine shortages, crime, killings and injuries spiral out of control in Venezuela.
US President Donald Trump, who was once called , is not exactly conventional or predictable. This week, Trump declared that he would behonored to , the dashing dictator of North Korea. Of course, the president would only meet Kim under the right circumstances and thinks the young leader is a pretty smart cookie for managing to cling on to his saddle despite others wanting to unseat him.
Trump also invited Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to the White House. Duterte raises hackles in Europe and the US because of his crackdown on drugs,and authoritarian tendencies. Of course, there is also the tiny matter of the powerful Philippine leaderthat worries foreign policy wonks in Washington. Given this backstory, you have to give marks to Trump for being creative in solving the Duterte problem. Presumably, The Donald believes that the warmth of his welcome and deal-making skills might seduce the Philippines back to Uncle Sams warm bed.
It remains to be seen if Trump succeeds with Kim or Duterte, but he seems to be picking up Washingtons deal-making tricks. The presidentthat averts government shutdown. Much haggling resulted in this bill and it is merely 1,665 pages long. Both Democrats and Republicans claimed victory and assert that the bill reflected their priorities. Indubitably, they have perused the 1,655 pages to come to their conclusions.
To add the cherry to the cake, Trump and Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House of Representatives, achieved a long overdue win. The House passed a bill abolishing Obamacare and launching Trumpcare. The March 26 edition ofThe World This Weekchronicled how the failure to repeal Obamacare was bad for Trump, worse for Ryan and disastrous for the Grand Old Party (GOP). Now, Trump, Ryan and the GOP can heave a sigh of relief.
Like Dracula,has come back from the dead. The bill is now in the Senates court. Although senators will most likely kill the bill, the prospects of Trumpcare is increasing uncertainty in the American health care system. Already, insurance companies, medical providers and common citizens are grappling of rules and 7,432 pages of proposed rules. There might just be new set of rules to play by.
Trump is certainly shaking up fusty Washington. Some have hailed the presidents first 100 days in office as. Others are horrified by what The Donald has been up to. Glenn Carle, a foreign policy wonk who once served in the Central Intelligence Agency, is one of them. He frets that the arbitrary and authoritarian Trump is turning the US into a bigger version of Venezuela.
Carle might not be entirely right, but Venezuela certainly offers rich lessons about the limitations of populism. This week, mass protests brought the country to a standstill.
HAUNTED BY HUGO CHVEZ
The Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela(PSUV), or the United Socialist Party of Venezuela, rules the roost in the country. It is led by Nicol獺s Maduro, successor to the visible, vocal and controversial latewho founded the PSUV. Ch獺vez remains the eternal president and his followers are popularly calledChavistas. The dead Venezuelan leader was populist and socialist. He admired and was an ally of the lateFidel Castro.
Just as Castro attacked Moncada army barracks in 1953, the paratrooper Ch獺vez attempted a coup in 1992. The government of the day had presided over neoliberal policies since 1989 and was rather unpopular. It implemented severe spending cuts proposed by the International Monetary Fund. These cuts caused much hardship and led to mass protests, known as theCaracazo. In response, the Venezuelan government cracked down on protesters with a heavy hand. This gave Ch獺vez his chance to attempt a coup.
Ch獺vezs coup attempt failed quite spectacularly. Yet it served him well. Poor and disenchanted middle-class Venezuelans fell in love withmestizoCh獺vez for standing up to the posh white elites of Caracas. As the September 4, 2016, edition ofThe World This Weekpointed out, the descendants of the conquistadores in Latin America sit at the top of the food chain with the most wealth and land. The aristocracy of rank, office and wealth that Simon Bolivar condemned still persists and Latin America continues to be the worlds most unequal region. Therefore, socialism has an enduring appeal and Ch獺vez emerged as the darling of the left once he got out of prison.
In 1999, Ch獺vez became president when Venezuelans turned against their traditional political elite. He had been railing against neoliberal economics of Washington and traveling through Latin America to boost his public image.in the 1990s led to social unrest and allowed Ch獺vez to grab the presidency just as the old order was falling apart. The disenfranchised poor and the disenchanted middle class voted for him in droves.
Ch獺vez proved to be a canny president. He began as a center-left moderate and retained some figures from the previous government. Soon, he began to remove checks and balances. Plan Bolivar 2000, a social welfare program, andAl籀 Presidente, a Sunday morning radio show, strengthened Ch獺vezs hold on the public. A few months prior, he had won a referendum and summoned a new constituent assembly. Today, the 1999 constitution still governs Venezuela.
Ch獺vez won 13 electoral victories before voters rejected his new constitution in 2007. Still, he was able to win a 2009 referendum that abolished term limits. Ch獺vez died in 2013 but his legacy still lives on. Even when he was alive, coup plots, mass protests and big strikes were par for the course. Yet Ch獺vez was able to triumph over threats because of. He was the classiccaudillo, a Latin American strongman ruling through charm and menace. Dead,Chavismoor socialism for the 21stcentury is losing its appeal but retains a significant following.
Kirk Hawkins offers valuable insights on. It was a movement built around the personality of Ch獺vez that aimed to fundamentally transform society. 啦堯梗泭mestizosought to establish a personal relationship with his voters, unmediated by any institutionalized party. As per Hawkins,Chavismobased itself on a Manichean discourse of the people versus the elite and an anything goes attitude amongst its adherents.
In many ways,Chavismois quite similar to the narrative peddled by populists like Trump and Marine Le Pen. It shares its suspicion of institutions with parties led by lower-caste leaders in India who distrust colonial laws, upper-caste bureaucrats and market forces after suffering centuries of discrimination.The big difference is that Ch獺vez was able to latch on to power and implement his ideas through multiple social programs. He did so through pouring proceeds of oil revenues into aimed at expanding access to food, housing, health care and education. Poverty dropped, literacy increased and quality of life improved for poor Venezuelans. Income inequality dropped as well.
Yet not all was well even in the heydays of Ch獺vez. Good old patronage, inefficiency, mismanagement, cronyism and corruption continued to plague Venezuela. Tearing down institutions led to soaring crime, skyrocketing violence, falling productivity and increasing inflation. Ch獺vez founded the PSUV in 2006 to unite the left, give it grassroots heft and prepare the next generation of leaders. Yet the party fostered no tradition of debate, discussion and critical thinking. The PSUV remains a maudlin personality cult. The ruling party has failed to realize thatChavismosuffered from a fundamental problem. As Valentina Perez points out in, it was simply not sustainable.
According to the(OPEC), Venezuela has the worlds largest proven crude oil reserves. Ch獺vez hit the jackpot when he came to office. Oil prices went up from $10 per barrel in 1999 to $126 in 2008. Unlike Norwegian leaders, Ch獺vez did not prove to be a good shepherd of his fortune. He profligately squandered money merrily, subsidizingand forshivering in the cold. Ch獺vez forgot that poor countries have to invest wisely. Sending money to rich countries to score empty brownie points is a luxury they can ill afford.
Naturally, the party had to end. By the end of his life, Ch獺vez presided over a country in chaos, with poverty, inflation, shortages, crime and killings spiraling out of control as hisChavistastate lost control.
DEMONSTRATIONS, DIVISIONS AND DISTRESS
Maduro, Ch獺vezs insipid and uninspiring successor, is dealing with chickens ofChavismothat have come home to roost.the 2013 election by about 200,000 votes, a majority of less than 1.5%. Henrique Capriles, the defeated opposition candidate, alleged fraud. In any case, theChavistaregime had allowed the opposition virtually no airtime on television. Unsurprisingly,broke out on the streets.
Since then, protests have never really stopped. The most recent demonstrations were triggered when the not quite independent Supreme Court decided to take over the powers of the opposition-controlled National Assembly on March 29. Outrage erupted at this judicial coup and Maduro appealed to the court to review its ruling . The court promptly backtracked but public fury did not subside. Venezuelan authorities have most convenientlyfrom running for office for 15 years.
With Venezuela in economic free fall, social upheaval and political chaos, the opposition has smelt blood. Incessant protests for more than a month have brought the country to a standstill.too. Supporters of the regime have taken to the streets as well. After all,Chavistasstill exist in large numbers. The opposition accuses the government of eroding democratic institutions and mismanaging the economy. The government derides the opposition as elitist, exploitative and in the pay of Uncle Sam.
The opposition demands the removal of judges who attempted a coup, release of political prisoners and immediate elections. On May Day, Maduro made a countermove by proposing a new peoples body to. Julio Borges, the leader of the National Assembly, has denounced Maduros proposition as a scam to deceive the Venezuelan people with a mechanism that is nothing more than a tightening of the coup in Venezuela.
啦堯梗泭Chavistaregime has dismantled democratic institutions. Issues are no longer debated in the legislature. Politicians representing different interest groups no longer negotiate with each other. In a racially, socially and economically divided society, polarization has turned extreme. Protests and counter-protests invariably lead to clashes. Violence is the order of the day with many dying and many more suffering injuries. Passions are waxing as trust is waning in a society that is splitting at the seams.
Meanwhile, life in Venezuela is turning nasty, brutish and often short. In 2016,. In 2015, inflation was a comparatively moderate 180.9% and GDP shrank only 5.7%. The government has imposed currency controls and increased minimum wages. They have not worked. Factories sit idle, grocers have no food to sell and hospitals have no medicines.reports that 74% of Venezuelans have lost 8.7 kilograms in weight over the last year. The country is on the brink of total collapse.
Yet most bizarrely, Maduro is still making bond payments to creditors. In the words of, Maduro is so desperate to avoid defaulting on the countrys foreign debt that he is starving his own people, much the way Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceauescu did in the 1980s. Furthermore, Venezuelas despotic socialist government is mortgaging its industrial crown jewels. It absurdly. Has Maduro gone mad?
, another Harvard man and a former Venezuelan minister, provides an interesting answer. He takes the view that the chaos into which Venezuela has fallen may seem to be beyond belief but it is, in fact, a product of belief. In the late 17thcentury, witch hunting was a sensible conceptual paradigm or belief system in the land of Harvard and MIT. Maduro believes inChavismo, a glorious mish mash of, Marxism and. If devious business behavior is responsible for inflation and recession, then the answer is more regulation, more expropriations, and more managers in jail.
At the same time, Maduros regime has to save face and present to the world an illusion of strength. Hence, it shells out cash to Trump and to creditors, with Venezuelans literally paying the price in pounds of their flesh.
Maduros end may be nigh, but deeply-divided Venezuela is destined for distress in the days ahead.
*[You can receive The World This Week directly in your inbox by subscribing to our mailing list. Simply visit51勛圖and enter your email address in the space provided. Meanwhile, please find below five of our finest articles for the week.]
Great-Power Politics: Is China Outpacing the US?
With a bloated bureaucracy and ossified organizations, China stillfalls short of the US in terms of human capital, investment and innovation.
Today, many scholars and political scientists contend that Americas economic and military leadership is being worn away. The current assertion is that the apparent decline of the United States is mainly due to globalization: Over the past few decades, the integration of economies and the consequential diffusion of technology have led many developing countries to experience rates of economic growth that has consequences for the distribution of relative power among nations.
Those who advocate this position argue that the US is no longer efficient at sustaining its hegemonic roles. In addition, the proponents of this worldview claim that the global distribution of power is on the cusp of a massive adjustment. For them, the power is going to shift toward China in the next 50 years. According to this position, the Peoples Republic of China is Read more
Trump-Abbas Meeting: Hold Off on the Ululating and Mazel Tovs
If President Trump pulls this off, he will have elevated himself from mortal deal maker to American statesman. Former US Ambassador Gary Grappo explains.
Only one person benefited from the White House meeting on May 3 between US President Donald Trump and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Merely by having been invited and coming, Abbas may have shored up flagging confidence at home and dwindling support from other Arab states. But other than pleasant words, there was nothing to suggest that the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations are anywhere close to back on track.
For Trumps part, he exhibited his characteristic naivet矇,claimingthat solving the near-70-year dispute may not be as difficult as people have thought over the years. It is hard to imagine what it may have been in the detailed briefings the president should have received in advance of the meeting or in his conversation with Abbas or in hismeeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuin Read more
Tackling Structural Violence in Afghanistan
InAfghanistan, opportunity is not equally distributed among all citizens.
Afghanistans history is marked with the persistent struggle faced by the ethnic communities due to the countrys geostrategic significance and multi-ethnic divisions. Every historic change from the expansion of Islam into Persia, the Soviet invasion or the Afghan Civil War, followed by the era of Taliban rule has involved the use of this split, leading to acute sectarian segregation and further subjugation of the less powerful ethnicities.
Johan Galtungdefines structural violence as the difference between the potential and the actual realization that is built into the structure and emerges as unequal power and, consequently, as unequal life chances. It can be referred to as systematic exclusion of a particular sector of a nation from the state apparatus and developmental projects. As a major ethnic group, thePashtuns have come to dominatethe power structures for decades. This political, economic and military dominance of one ethnic group has Read more
What Next for Brexit Britain?
Britain believes it can make a success of itself on its own terms. This is sheer folly.
After waking up on a Saturday morning there is always the experience of getting up early, sinking a strong coffee with breakfast, and open-endedly reading the pages of news stories while thinking through how to best utilize the weekend. The themes ofBrexit,Europe, the upcoming UK General Election and the recent local elections fill many of the pages of online commentary today.
In my mind, and given what I have seen, heard and experienced having returned to Britain after six years away, is how far matters have retreated backward. There is so much sheerhateand indignation toward Muslims and others thought to be different from a sense of dominant white English society. The United Kingdom has changed for the worse, although it was already heading in the wrong direction by 2010, the year I left Britain, two years after Read more
Irans Quest for a New Islamic Civilization
Iran is reshaping its role as a regional leader in the Middle East.
In February, the Islamic Republic celebrated the 38th year of the revolution. Soon after the Iranian Revolution succeeded in 1979, the new regime had two missions: providing support for oppressed populations especially Shia minorities in the Middle East and the world and purifying the system from unwanted elements loyal to the shah, the West and the Soviet Union.
To mobilize the masses, Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, presented his message through a bricolage with the goal of mobilizing accepted structures for new purposes under the Islamic regime. AsRay Takeyh points out, a majority of post-revolution Iranians accepted the idea that religion and traditional values should play a greater role in political and social order. By crafting a message that rang true to popular claims, Khomeini was able to present an appealing idealism around the dream of a Shia Iran taking Read more
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect 51勛圖s editorial policy.
Photo Credit:
Support 51勛圖
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51勛圖 has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOs journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.












Commenting Guidelines
Please read our commenting guidelines before commenting.
1. Be Respectful: Please be polite to the author. Avoid hostility. The whole point of 51勛圖 is openness to different perspectives from perspectives from around the world.
2. Comment Thoughtfully: Please be relevant and constructive. We do not allow personal attacks, disinformation or trolling. We will remove hate speech or incitement.
3. Contribute Usefully: Add something of value a point of view, an argument, a personal experience or a relevant link if you are citing statistics and key facts.
Please agree to the guidelines before proceeding.