Germany funds foundations for its political parties. If the far right gets one, we’re one step closer to globalizing the alt-right.
Germany got its very own electoral shock on September 24, when the . For the first time in more than half a century, the far right will be represented in the German parliament, with more than 90 seats. Although its now Germanys third most popular party behind the Christian Democrats (CDU) and the Social Democrats (SDP) the Alternative for Germany (AfD) is still too toxic to become part of a ruling coalition.
But the AfD will have influence well beyond its numbers. In a nutshell,泭, things are about to get a lot nastier.
The AfDs electoral victory has destroyed the taboo in Germany that has kept the far right on the fringes. It will inevitably pull the ruling Christian Democrats further to the right, particularly on social issues like immigration. It may even have an impact on the ongoing discussions about the fate of the European Union.
Beyond Germany, the AfDs success will give a shot in the arm to other far-right formations, particularly after the National Fronts losses in the last French elections. Looking a little further down the road, if it manages to return to parliament in the next election, the AfD will qualify for government money to create its own party foundation, which will enable Germanys far right to spread its message all over the world.
Europes rebellion against liberalism in both its economic and social versions is continuing to shake up politics as usual. An equally unsettling question, though, is how much it will shake up geopolitics as usual.
What the AfD Wants
The far right in Germany has followed much the same script as the Tea Party and the Trump movement in the United States. It began in 2013 with several academics angry about the eurozone (and, by extension, the EU). But just like 泭until he started talking about the so-called threat of immigrants in Virginia and ended up taking House Majority Leader Eric Cantors seat in 2014 the AfD only became truly popular by stoking anti-immigrant sentiment.
As Chancellor Angela Merkel of the Christian Democrats welcomed refugees into Germany in 2015 an influx, to date, of around 1.3 million people the AfD began to peel away support from the center-right CDU. Even the purportedly moderate faces of the AfD, like Jorg Muethen,泭泭that in some German cities, I struggle to find Germans on the streets, thus equating German citizenship with skin color or other external markers.
The party has advocated border controls effectively abrogating the Schengen system of free movement within many EU member states as well as new border patrols. Frauke Petry, a party leader who is also considered a moderate, has said that these new border police units泭should if necessary as they try to make it into the country.
Central to the anti-immigrant message has been Islamophobia. The party plastered the streets of Germany with posters like the one that showed two young, bikini-clad women from behind that read, Burkas? We like bikinis. On Facebook, it distributed an ad showing bloody tire tracks with the caption: The tracks left by the world chancellor in Europe, linking Merkels refugee policy to terrorist attacks around the continent.
The party has other deeply disturbing positions, like its denial of climate change. But what has caused some division within the party is its attitude toward German history. One party leader, . Since current German policy is firmly in the camp of condemnation of Nazis, its quite sobering to imagine the kind of policy that Hocke prefers.
This German corollary to Trumps appeal to white supremacists and neo-Nazis has divided the party. this week after announcing that she wouldnt sit in parliament with the party faction. Reportedly, Petry has wanted to purge the party of its extremist elements at least those who take an extremist position on the history question just as Marine Le Pen attempted to clean up the National Front by kicking her anti-Semitic father out of the French far-right party.
According to泭, 35 of 94 are right-wing extremists. So its not just about a purge of one or two bad apples. Expect the AfD to split along the same泭娶梗硃梭棗泭硃紳餃泭fundi泭 realist vs. fundamentalist fault line of the Greens.
A key connection between AfD and Donald Trump, the UK Independence Party and right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is泭their . Hes responsible for the bikini and tire tracks ad campaigns. Hes adept at fusing anti-immigrant, Islamophobic and race-baiting messages. But with one of his suggestions for the AfD, Harris went too far. The party rejected his suggestion of Germany for Germans as a campaign slogan. Perhaps it will resurface in the next election, if the so-called moderates abandon the party.
Has the Right Already Won?
Finally, what would a modern election be without Russian interference?
In the lead-up to the election, several major newspapers泭noted泭that . Perhaps they spoke too soon. First to consider are the Russian speakers, those with German heritage whove relocated to Germany since the 1980s the right kind of immigrants from AfDs point of view. The 泭comes from this constituency, and it has helped the party become the second most popular one in former East Germany.
Then there was the obligatory visit to Moscow, as Petry made her pilgrimage last February 硃紳餃泭met with, among others, the truly beyond-the-pale . As the election entered its last phase, the usual trolls and Twitter bots came out to play, at least泭some of them . Again, as with Trump, the Kremlin isnt interested in promoting a particular party in the hopes that it will win or reorient the countrys foreign policy. It simply wants to shake up a status quo that it perceives as tilted against Russia.
Even though the radical right has lost some recent elections notably in France and in the Netherlands it has nevertheless transformed the debate in Europe. Consider the immigration situation. This month, the two-year program to relocate 160,000 migrants from Greece and Italy to other EU member states came to an end. It managed to泭, and only with great effort. Some countries notably Poland and Hungary refused to locate a single migrant. More than 20 member states failed to meet their obligatory target by 50%.
Far-right populists poisoned the discourse on immigration, denouncing millions of people as well as linking this scourge to the EU, multiculturalism and liberal politics more generally. Throughout the continent, EU member states are tightening their immigration laws, increasing the number of deportations and sweeping away informal settlements泭泭in the northern French town of Calais.
The right-wing populists have already won the upcoming elections in Europe, no matter what the outcome is,泭泭in泭Deutsche Welle. The EU has done away with human rights and Western standards of civilization by cooperating with the Libyan coastguard, African dictators, and deporting people back to war zones.
Then theres the issue of helping countries like Greece exit their perpetual financial crisis.泭Discussions this week泭between seem to point the way toward fresh loans and the prospect of Greece becoming fiscally independent by next August. But if Merkel has to bring the Free Democrats into a coalition government, shell have to reckon with that partys red line on reforming the eurozone to facilitate fiscal transfers to countries like Greece. The euroskeptic AfD will rejoice.
Elsewhere in Europe
The French turned back the tide of hatred in the last presidential and parliamentary elections. The National Front, once seemingly on an unstoppable roll, now has only eight seats in parliament, and its leader . In the wake of Le Pens losses, pundits wondered if Trump has had a bracing effect on Europe. Europeans see how Trump has transformed the United States into a three-ring circus, and they want none of it.
But thats France. Elsewhere, the far right continues its march. In Norway, for instance, the right-wing Progress Party pulled in a respectable 15% in September elections, good enough for it to continue as a coalition partner with the Conservative Party. But perhaps thats because the Progress Party, despite its anti-immigrant and pro-nationalist approach, isnt泭.
A more authentically radical right is poised to take over in Austria in elections next month. There, the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) is泭泭than the AfD in the low 20s. It would be doing even better if the center-right Peoples Party (OVP) hadnt started to take up its anti-immigration, Islamophobic message. The bullet dodged at the end of last year when independent t defeated Freedom Party leader Norbert Hofer seems to have taken a boomerang trajectory.
Worse, the center right in Austria, unlike its counterpart in Germany, has no problems with forming a government with the far right. Given that泭泭 more than in Germany or France or Switzerland it can count on considerable popular support for such a coalition.
In the Czech Republic, meanwhile, a泭泭is likely to win next months presidential election. Andrej Babis, currently the finance minister, is a billionaire whos skeptical of the European Union and wants to close the EUs borders to keep out immigrants. His involvement in a corruption scandal involving one of his enterprises illegally receiving EU subsidies oh, the hypocrisy! doesnt seem to have harmed his popular standing.
The AfDs win may well encourage this political trajectory in Europe and beyond. Its still hard to imagine the party successfully pushing through legislation or having much impact on governance. But if the party gets above 5% 泭of the vote in the next parliamentary elections, it will win the right to form its own international foundation. Of course, the Bundestag might deploy various stalling tactics to prevent such an official funding stream as it did when the left-wing Die Linke qualified but theres a strong bias in German political culture to observe the rules.
Ive worked with German foundations all over the world: Friedrich Ebert (Social Democrats), Friedrich Naumann (Free Democrats), Heinrich Boll (the Green Party) and Rosa Luxemburg (Die Linke). Funded by German taxpayers, theyve all provided valuable support for civil society and in promoting useful exchange of ideas. The prospect of German government money helping to spread far right-wing politics globally is a nightmare scenario. Germany just took one step closer to helping globalize the alt-right and recycle from historys dustbin something that ought never again see the light of day: a Fascist International.
*[This article was originally published by .]
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect 51勛圖s editorial policy.
Photo Credit:泭泭/
Support 51勛圖
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51勛圖 has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOs journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.







Commenting Guidelines
Please read our commenting guidelines before commenting.
1. Be Respectful: Please be polite to the author. Avoid hostility. The whole point of 51勛圖 is openness to different perspectives from perspectives from around the world.
2. Comment Thoughtfully: Please be relevant and constructive. We do not allow personal attacks, disinformation or trolling. We will remove hate speech or incitement.
3. Contribute Usefully: Add something of value a point of view, an argument, a personal experience or a relevant link if you are citing statistics and key facts.
Please agree to the guidelines before proceeding.