Itās not the bondage thatās the problem with the upcoming blockbuster, but something more mundane.
Fifty Shades of Grey film opens this Valentineās weekend to much fanfare but, perhaps tellingly, with few press previews in the United Kingdom. With one British cinema chain advance ticket sales worth Ā£1.3 million, itās pretty clear the adaptation of E. L. Jamesā best-selling book is going to be critic-proof.
It is difficult to write about Fifty Shades without being caught up in excess: translated into 51 languages, more than 100 million , 50 million-plus views of the trailer on YouTube. This is the novel that has spiced up (heterosexual) marital bedrooms and led to its own range of sex toys. To cash in on the filmās release, British DIY retailer B&Q staff to expect soaring sales of cable ties and duct tape. Thereās even a limited edition Fifty Shades of Surf detergent to help with the post-coital clean up.
From the trilogyās sadistic billionaire to laundry detergent might seem like quite a leap. But at the heart of Fifty Shadesā success has been the juxtaposition of the apparent ordinariness of both the novelās heroine, Ana Steele, and the middle-aged, middle-class mother who wrote it (originally as fan fiction) with the extraordinarily wealthy, extraordinarily sexy, extraordinarily messed-up Christian Grey.
Despite, or perhaps because of, its resolutely heterosexual address, the Fifty Shades phenomenon has been defined by womenās relationships with one another as much, if not more than, with men. This has clearly been played on in the portrayal of director Sam Taylor-Johnson of the filmās release: another middle-aged mom, overlooked professionally after the birth of her four children, given a second chance by Fifty Shades.
Of course, thereās also been much criticism of the book and, now, the film. At times, this criticism has itself been steeped in a barely disguised misogyny directed toward the author, fans or director. This has, in turn, made it easier for Fifty Shadesā supporters to claim that the phenomenon is doing feminist work. So the challenge for feminist critics of Fifty Shades is to air our concerns without pandering to mainstream mediaās penchant for pitting women against women, or being dragged into a discussion about the relative merits of particular sexual practices.
Love and Abuse
Looked at more closely, the sex in Fifty Shades turns out to be something of a distraction. One of the most resilient claims about the book ā central to Universalās Valentineās release strategy for the film ā is that it is, underneath all the distracting ākinky f**kery,ā a love story.
I agree. This is not an endorsement, it is simply a statement about the kind of story it is. While the sex is certainly not irrelevant, it is love that is most consistently used as a justification for abuse outside the parameters of BDSM.
It is not surprising, then, that much of the of Fifty Shades has come from feminists delivering frontline services to women fleeing domestic abuse. The most high-profile campaign against the film, hash-tagged , encourages potential viewers to recognize this connection by donating the price of their cinema tickets to a local refuge.
Taylor-Johnsonās most recent interviews seem designed to get it back on safer ground: āDo feminists always have to be on top?ā she . Despite the reality of her own struggles to get back āon topā professionally after the birth of her children, this is meant to be a sexual and not a social question.
It should go without saying that women (and men) can and do choose to engage in a spectrum of BDSM-related activities. If these choices are made between participants who have an equal standing in the negotiation, then I fail to see why this should be anyone elseās business.
But thereās the problem. Christian and Ana are not equals outside of their sexual relationship, and so the fantasy of sexual submission collides with a more brutal reality. Iām far less concerned with what Ana and Christian do in the bedroom (and in the bath, the elevator, the car, on the piano ā¦) than how Christianās controlling behavior outside of it not only determines the conditions of Anaās āconsent,ā but is in itself a form of abuse.
He monitors what she eats and drinks, what she drives, where she works, what she wears, who she sees, what they do. More insidiously, he does all of this because he loves her, and his wealth legitimates and luxuriously brands his choices. Itās not for nothing that this has been āwealth porn.ā Whatās more, Christianās controlling behavior is repeatedly shown to save Ana ā from herself as well as from a stream of men whose intentions she dangerously misreads.
This is what feminists have long referred to as the male-protection racket. Itās the plot of countless romance novels whose naĆÆve, young protagonists are paired with more worldly powerful men. Thirty years on, the debate over Fifty Shades has become more hedonistic while arguably serving an equally conservative function: the end destination is still heterosexual marriage and children, with other options quickly closed down.
Fifty Shades of Entitlement
Positioning herself firmly within the demographic the book has appealed to, James has repeatedly, if somewhat coyly, of the pleasures of conducting her research for the novelās sex scenes with her husband. The novel was her fantasy, written for herself in the first instance.
Whether individual women find new pleasure from butt plugs is not the point here. Rather, the novelās engagement with broader debates about gendered violence and power cannot be fantasized away. After all, one of the constants across all three novels is Anaās explicit labeling of Christianās controlling behavior outside the bedroom as āstalking.ā Yet she accepts that he does it because he loves her.
This is consistent with a wider cultural script in which obsessive male behavior and menās sense of entitlement to women is still too often legitimated, with concrete, material effects on womenās safety and lives. Ana agrees to marry Christian at aged 21, and just weeks into their relationship, because he needs reassurance that she is āhis,ā she modifies her behavior to contain his rage, in recognition of the maternal neglect and pedophilic abuse (by an older woman) that has brought him here. Male violence is womenās responsibility.
And itās this, rather than any of the sexual practices, that troubles me most about Fifty Shades. It undoes feminism not because Ana āchoosesā to be submissive in some of their sexual scenes, but rather because it uses BDSM as a smokescreen to disguise a very conventional abusive relationship.
*[To mark Valentineās Day 2015, 51³Ō¹Ļ will be releasing a new 360° series on sexuality. For further information, please email us. This article was originally published by .] ![]()
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible. Join over 400 people to become a donor or you could choose to be a sponsor.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect 51³Ō¹Ļ’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: /
Support 51³Ō¹Ļ
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51³Ō¹Ļ has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnāt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOās journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.















Comment