The Biden administration has convened an interagency council to help solve Americaās supply chain problem, an initiative that University of Pennsylvania Wharton School professor welcomed as an effort to try to reduce inflation by increasing supply.
āIn terms of a grade, I would give it an A-plus for what itās trying to do, but obviously an incomplete because theyāre just starting. So, the devil will be in the execution details,ā Fisher said during an with Wharton Business Daily on SiriusXM.
The new White House Council on Supply Chain Resilience was last month as part of nearly 30 new actions to strengthen supply chains described as critical to economic and national security. The actions include using the Defense Production Act to increase domestic manufacturing of essential medicines, along with a number of administrative measures to share data and develop a better strategy to deal with the types of disruptions that left store shelves bare during the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The pandemic has subsided, yet the shortages persist, raising concerns about offshoring and higher prices amid dwindling supplies. From 2021 to 2022, retail food prices rose by , the largest increase in 40 years, according to government data.
Fisher, a professor in the department of operations, information and decisions, said Bidenās plan is a bit of a ānovel approachā to attacking inflation. Typically, the Federal Reserve takes the lead on combating inflation by raising interest rates to temper demand. The Fed has raised the benchmark rate since 2022.
āWhat is inflation? Itās an imbalance between supply and demand,ā he said. āSo far, weāve focused on reducing demand. But this gives us a second approach: Letās make sure also that we improve supply by avoiding disruptions to supply chains.ā
What production is essential?
Offshoring has always been around, but it became widespread across industries in the late 1970s when China began investing in low-cost manufacturing, Fisher said.
āInstead of getting something from 100 miles away, youāre getting it from halfway around the world. And thatās when you realize that itās low-cost, but itās also very vulnerable,ā he said. Factories can shutter for a host of reasons ā natural and man-made disasters, war, political instability, the list goes on.
Bringing more production back to the US would help with shortages, but Fisher said the new council will have a tough time figuring out what products are so essential that they should be made on American soil. He described himself as a āskepticā on domestic manufacturing and pointed out the many advantages of participating in the global economy. Trading with other nations creates allies and builds influence. In that context, Fisher said, the US has more to gain from being friends with China than enemies. The same goes for many Central and South American nations from which immigrants come seeking greater economic opportunity.
āThereās a saying that when trade crosses country boundaries, armies donāt,ā he said. āA critique I have of generally bringing manufacturing home to the US is there are also advantages to sourcing from other countries and having strong relationships with as many countries as we can.ā
Fisher is also critical of whatās missing in Bidenās plan: specific mention of the less developed nations that make much of the worldās goods, such as Bangladesh. Instead, Canada, Mexico, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan and several other developed economies are named.
āWhen I look at the list of countries involved in this initiative, I would add to that list less developed nations, which are important to developed nations as a source of low-cost supply,ā he said.
Supply resilience is in vogue
Fisher has spent more than 35 years studying supply chains, examining industries as diverse as transportation and fashion. Before joining Wharton in 1975, Fisher was a systems engineer in the Boston Manufacturing and Distribution Sales office of IBM and on the faculty of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. He doesnāt recall a time during his experience when supply chains were part of daily conversations among Americans as they are now. Recent product shortages of antibiotics, baby formula, computer chips that power most electronics, and other everyday items have people talking.
āBe careful what you wish for,ā he said with a chuckle. āAll my career, Iāve pretty much labored in obscurity, studying supply chains. Suddenly, it became front-page news, but not exactly good news.ā
[ first published this piece.]
The views expressed in this article are the authorās own and do not necessarily reflect 51³Ō¹Ļās editorial policy.
Support 51³Ō¹Ļ
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, 51³Ō¹Ļ has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesnāt come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FOās journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.










Comment