Neil Francis, Author at 51Թ /author/neil-francis/ Fact-based, well-reasoned perspectives from around the world Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:42:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Does Money Buy Happiness and Meaning? /culture/neil-francis-does-money-buy-happiness-meaning-consumer-psychology-news-17719/ Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:15:06 +0000 /?p=90355 When you see multimillionaires, with their yachts and luxury houses, you probably assume that they are supremely happy. However, you might be surprised to hear that this is not necessarily the case. In 2006, Princeton University psychologist, economist and author Daniel Kahneman and a team of researchers conducted a study entitled “Would You Be Happier… Continue reading Does Money Buy Happiness and Meaning?

The post Does Money Buy Happiness and Meaning? appeared first on 51Թ.

]]>
When you see multimillionaires, with their yachts and luxury houses, you probably assume that they are supremely happy. However, you might be surprised to hear that this is not necessarily the case. In 2006, Princeton University psychologist, economist and author and a team of researchers conducted a entitled “Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion.” Kahneman and his co-authors found that although people with high incomes are more likely than others to say they’re generally happy with their lives, this difference virtually disappears when they make a moment-to-moment assessment of how happy they really are.

The study was published in . Their findings described a phenomenon known as the “focusing illusion,” which misleads people into believing that more money can — or does — make them happier. The more narrowly individuals focus on a particular aspect of their lives, the greater its apparent influence.


The Power Paradox: Does Absolute Power Corrupt Absolutely?

READ MORE


“When people consider the impact of any single factor on their wellbeing — not only income — they are prone to exaggerate its importance,” the researchers explain. So, when survey respondents are asked, for example, whether wealthier people are happier than those less well off, they tend to focus on financial status as the root of happiness.

In reality, according to the study, higher income does little to improve life satisfaction and may even cause more anxiety and stress. When you compare things like cars, careers, holiday destinations, you tend to focus on one aspect particular closely, neglecting the hundred other factors in your life. You assign this one inordinate significance because of the focusing illusion.

In his , “The Art of the Good Life: Clear Thinking for Business and a Better Life,” shares details about another study that Kahneman carried out with . They asked motorists how much pleasure they got from their car? Their conclusion: When somebody sinks a load of money into a car, at least they get a good return on their investment in the form of joy. But here is the really interesting point. They then asked this question: How happy were you during your last car trip? They then compared the motorists’ answers with the values of their cars. The outcome — absolutely no correlation. Whether respondents were driving a top-end luxury car or a second-hand banger, there was no correlation between the car they were driving to how happy they were feeling. Question one showed a definite correlation between the perceived pleasure it gave its owner and the monetary value of the car. But the second question saw no correlation at all. A luxury car didn’t make the drivers any happier.

That is the effect of the focusing illusion: A car makes you happy when you are thinking about it but not when you are driving it. Thinking about your purchase of the car in a forced way makes you happy, but the more you use it, this fades to the back of your mind, and that minimizes the effect on your happiness. You can apply this to any other material purchases.

How can you spend your time doing things that would definitely enrich and benefit your life from these sources when your thoughts are consumed by purchasing material goods? You are conned into the illusion that these will make you happy, but, actually, all the evidence shows they do not.

Everyone overestimates the impact of material purchases on their well-being and underestimates the impact of meaning in your life through rewarding experiences. The evidence points to these experiences can increase your well-being significantly.

*[Neil Francis is the of “Inspired Thinking” (LID Publishing, 2020).]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect 51Թ’s editorial policy.

The post Does Money Buy Happiness and Meaning? appeared first on 51Թ.

]]>
Does “Positive Thinking” Have a Place in Politics? /culture/positive-thinking-self-help-books-donald-trump-boris-johnson-politics-news-13241/ Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:14:00 +0000 /?p=85116 To make money in the world of self-help books, being realistic and balanced, and where failure is accepted as a good thing, will not work. It seems that the leaders of America and the United Kingdom have cottoned on to this. It is well documented that Donald Trump is a big fan of the 20th-century positive-thinking… Continue reading Does “Positive Thinking” Have a Place in Politics?

The post Does “Positive Thinking” Have a Place in Politics? appeared first on 51Թ.

]]>
To make money in the world of self-help books, being realistic and balanced, and where failure is accepted as a good thing, will not work. It seems that the leaders of America and the United Kingdom have cottoned on to this. It is well documented that Donald Trump is a big fan of the 20th-century and some of its books. You can see this in the language he adopts: 

“No dream is too big. No challenge is too great. Nothing we want for our future is beyond our reach.” 

“I’ve always won, and I’m going to continue to win. And that’s the way it is.”

 “I was a great student. I was good at everything.”

It is unclear whether Boris Johnson had read any of these “positive thinking” books, but somehow, their teachings have rubbed onto him as well, given that he has adopted a lot of their mantras:

“There are no disasters, only opportunities.”

 “The doubters, the doomsters, the gloomsters.” 

“The hamster wheel of doom.” 

Many people should be very concerned that the two most powerful leaders in the Western world seem to follow and advocate the teachings of some of the most “successful” self-help gurus. Because some of their messages can not only be harmful where the vulnerable are easy prey, but also psychologically dangerous. 

In 1937, Napoleon Hill published “,” a book that has reportedly sold over 15 million copies to date. The key lesson from this work is that the material universe is governed quite directly by our thoughts. By simply visualizing what you want out of life, those things, and more, will be delivered to you — especially if those things involve money. The past few decades have been a profitable era for all sorts of self-help and business success books. Napoleon Hill blazed a trail for an entire industry.

In 1952, Norman Vincent Peale published his “.” His core argument is that by using the power of focus and by believing in success, you will overcome any obstacles in life. No matter how insurmountable they may seem, there is no problem in your life that cannot be surmounted by the power of positive thinking.

More recently, in 2006, Rhonda Byrne’s book, “,” promoted the notion that you have the ability to be whatever you want to be, and that if you send out good thoughts and intentions to the universe, the universe will give you good things in return. According to Byrne, positive thoughts attract happiness and, conversely, negative thoughts attract bad decisions and fuel existing worries and negativity. She claims that focused concentration combined with positive thinking will lead to happiness and wealth.

The Misuse of “Positive Thinking”

These three authors, and many others, subscribe to basically the same thing: think positive things, visualize the success that will make you happy and wealthy, and you will achieve anything you want.

Now, there is some merit in this type of “positive thinking,” and millions of people have benefited from some of its teachings. For example, in 1960, Hill and W. Clement Stone  “Success Through a Positive Mental Attitude,” where they promoted the same idea as Peale. They coined the term “positive mental attitude,” or PMA. Today, there is a lot of scientific evidence from well-respected psychologists and scientists that having a positive mental attitude can provide a wide range of health and emotional benefits.

However, the essence of some of these approaches is to deceive yourself by denying — or ignoring — reality. They propose that one should block out challenges and think and visualize only positive outcomes to solve everything. This means that when you are feeling sad, anxious, depressed or angry, you should intercept all negative thoughts with positive ones. They advocate repeating affirmations, which are positive statements to help you overcome self-sabotaging and negative thoughts. They claim that by repeating these often and believing in them, you will start to make positive changes.

Going back to Peale, his positive-thinking ideas that he promoted had a big effect on Trump. Peale was the long-time pastor at the Marble Collegiate Church in Manhattan, which Trump attended with his family growing up. Peale is quoted as saying things like, “Think big, and you’ll achieve big results. Think success, and you’ll have success.”

Playing With Fire

It is unclear whether people are aware of how much Peale has influenced Trump. In July of 2015, at the Iowa Family Leadership Summit, Trump talked about his : “Norman Vincent Peale — the great Norman Vincent — was my pastor. ‘The Power of Positive Thinking’ — everybody’s heard of Norman Vincent Peale. He was so great.”

There is now much academic and scientific evidence that demonstrates how practicing positive thinking in this way can actually be bad for you. Harvard Medical School professor and psychologist Susan David has done a lot of work in this area. In her , “Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change and Thrive in Work and Life,” she argues that forcing positive thoughts won’t make you happy.

David claims that avoiding negative emotions by either blocking them or trying to avoid them can do more harm than good. She argues that the idea that somehow people should all be happy, think happy and be positive all the time is antithetical to our real happiness. The reality is that life is fragile, and that you are going to get ill, or that you might lose your job or no longer love your job. And there is a lot of research that supports the view that people who strive to be happy actually, over time, become unhappy.

In 2014, Gabriele Oettingen, Professor of Psychology at New York University and the University of Hamburg, published her , “Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation.” Oettingen’s research showed that in the short term, positive thinking is beneficial, but over long periods of time, it saps motivation, prevents us from achieving our goals and leaves us feeling frustrated and stuck. To really move ahead in life, we need to engage with the world and feel energized, we need to go beyond positive thinking and face the obstacles that stand in our way.

Both Trump and Johnson are playing with fire by continuing to be disciples of the 20th-century positive-thinking movement. They need to disown and stop using the unrealistic language that they are both famous for. Instead, they owe it to the voters on both sides of the Atlantic to communicate a far more balanced and realistic view of the challenges and the uncertainties that both countries are currently facing.

*[Neil Francis is the author of “.”]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect 51Թ’s editorial policy.

The post Does “Positive Thinking” Have a Place in Politics? appeared first on 51Թ.

]]>